Group Project - Task 4: Final Presentation for Project

 

 

I.                 Review your group’s previous tasks (Task1 – Task3)

 

·         First, carefully review each of your group’s presentations and compare them with the project task guidelines. Find out whether your group’s analyses addressed the questions we had asked for the project as a whole (i.e. purpose of project).

 

·         Review your analysis from any or all of the tasks so that you can adequately address them in the final project and presentation.

 

 

Purpose of Project:

·         Comparison of the UW-Madison Students’ drinking behaviors (our Population) based on our samples with the Harvard School 1999 College Alcohol Study (National survey results)

·         Understanding the drinking patterns of UW-Madison students as a whole (our Population)

 

 

Questions:

1)      What are your conclusions on drinking behaviors for the whole population of UW-Madison compared to the national pattern? Are they similar to the national survey results, or significantly different from those? What analyses support your conclusions?

 

2)      Using the survey information you obtained in the sample, how can you describe the drinking pattern of UW-Madison students as a whole? Do not restrict your analysis to comparisons with the national survey, but provide descriptive analysis of the survey results from all groups.

 

3)      Is there any difference in drinking behavior between the national survey result and that of UW based on the characteristics of students surveyed?  Are their distinct populations of drinkers in the UW population based on location, gender, etc.?  Can you identify correlations between drinking and any other student characteristics?  For each conclusion, provide the analyses (testing, tables, graphs, correlations, etc.) that support your answer. Include both factors that make a difference as well as those that make no difference in comparison.

 

4)      How can you use your analyses for the UW-Madison? Is there any implication for the UW-Madison?  Should the university be concerned about the results?  Do the results offer any insight to addressing binge drinking as a problem?

 

5)      In retrospect, were your sampling design and sample size, data collection process, and questionnaire appropriate for our purpose? If so, explain why? If not, explain why not? Explain the potential impacts of sampling design to your result and its implications for future survey or analysis. How might your sampling design provide more or less representative samples than that used by Harvard?

 

 

·         Of equal importance, crosscheck each analysis with regard to whether all of your analyses (descriptive, inferential, correlation, etc.) are compatible with each other and that there are no contradictions among them (similar data used, no contradictory descriptions, conclusions, etc.).

 

·         To find out the general pattern of drinking behaviors of UW-Madison, you need to do some analysis with a composite sample of all groups’ surveys (between group comparison and within group comparison). You can add correlation and regression analysis too, to supplement your conclusions or arguments in the project.

·         Review the report of the Harvard Study to find some similarities or dissimilarities between your sample and the population. What is a big difference in our sample statistics compared with the population? What are the causes of the difference?

 

 

II.              Inferential analysis

·         Include at least 2 comparisons with Harvard study, 2 within UW population tests (i.e. samples from other groups), 2 within your sample comparisons (refer to guidelines of task 3).

·         You can try additional inferential analysis:

-          Hypothesis testing (Nonparametric test, ANOVA F-test, Chi-square test)

-          Correlation analysis

(If you come across problems or need data from other groups, email me ASAP.)

 

junghwaahn@students.wisc.edu

 

·         Save all your successful test/analysis results to make a report.

 

 

III.           Project Report

·         You may refer to the Harvard Study document to see how to make a final report for the project.

·         Your report should cover at least the following issues (including answers for questions):

 

1.      Introduction & problem statement

-            The purpose of your project and sampling design and data collection process, and its impacts on your analysis, etc. (refer to project guideline and task1 guideline)

 

2.      Descriptive statistics

-            The general drinking pattern of UW-Madison students as a whole, comparison with Harvard study,…. (refer to guidelines for task2)

 

3.      Inferential analysis

-            Testing and correlation analysis to answer questions above: you must show at least 4-5 tests (refer to guidelines for task 3)

 

4.      Conclusion and implication

-            Final conclusion for project and suggestion for application of your analysis; what you learned from this project, etc.

 

 

·         Your report should be between 5 ~ 7 pages long and your analysis and interpretations should be consistent with each other.

·         Final report due is 12/19 (F) 5:00 pm.

 

 

IV.           Make a summary for your presentation

·         Make a short summary report for final presentation on Wednesday of last week (12/10). 

Clearly state what your analyses tell us about drinking behavior of UW-Madison students.

·         Send your file to me by Tuesday (12/9) evening so that I can make a transparency copy for you.

·        After your presentation, turn in your project report to Chris or me. Remember that your project report should show all work from each pair, so that your group can get a fair grade.

·        Final presentation is also important in your final grade for the project. All members of your group are responsible to add their efforts to complete the report.

 

Project Grading (15% of course grade):

           - Completeness of tasks (7%)

           - Consistency of analyses (3%)

           - Final presentation (3%)

           - Creativeness & efforts (2%)