Geography 360

Sample Problem Set:

Data, Central Tendency

 

1.      A physical geographer would like to construct a data set to help with the analysis of deposition in a small watershed.  In particular, she is interested in the run-off from types of landuse.  Of the following examples of data, identify their type (nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio).  Compare the possible use of each (what does each data type allow the geographer to do?) and suggest possible costs of collecting each set of data.

 

A.       Use results of repeated measurements of run-off at a sample of sites representing high density urban, low density urban, agriculture, recreation, and forested landuses.

 

B.       Classify areas as high density urban, low density urban, agriculture, recreation, and forested land.

 

C.       Classify areas on a scale of 1 to 5 according to land use, with 1 having the highest and 5 the lowest run-off rates according to published studies.

 

D.       Rank sample sites according to scores attained by summing characteristics of slope, vegetative cover, and soil type each rated on a scale of 1 to 5 as a factor of run-off.

 

 

2.      Calculate the mean and median income for Latin America based on the average incomes for each of the countries provided below.  Compare the figures.  Which would a World Bank employee use to show the impact of development projects in the region?  Which would a resident of the region use to argue for additional foreign aid?  Do these values provide a good assessment of wealth in the region (considering on the values provided and not distributive issues within countries)?

 

GDP per Capita (PPP US$)

 

Argentina

12,377

 

Bolivia

2,424

 

Brazil

7,625

 

Chile

9,417

 

Colombia

6,248

 

Ecuador

3,203

 

Paraguay

4,426

 

Peru

4,799

 

Uruguay

9,035

 

Venezuela

5,794

 

       

         

         

         

         

         

         

                 

       

 

 

 

 

 

3.      The following data provides an assessment of conditions of democracy in the countries of Central America.  Values are given as 1 = free; 2 = almost free; 3 = not free.  How would you rate the data in regard to accuracy, precision, and viability?  Why might there be only three categories in which to place countries?  The publication also gave regional averages for each year (Caribbean 1.4, 1.4, 1.4, 1.4, 1.4, 1.4, 1.4, 1.3, 1.3, 1.3, 1.4).  Do you think that, given the type of data, these averages were appropriate?

 

 

2001

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

Antigua & Barbuda

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Bahamas

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Barbados

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Belize

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Cuba

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

Dominica

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Dominican Republic

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

Grenada

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Guyana

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Haiti

3

3

3

2

2

2

2

2

2

3

3

Jamaica

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

St. Kitts & Nevis

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

St. Lucia

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

St. Vincent & Grenadines

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Suriname

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

Trinidad & Tobago

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2